Read
Wheel of Heaven reads ancient texts — Raëlian, biblical, and cross-cultural — through a precessional clock, on the working hypothesis that the gods of those texts were a small advanced human civilization from elsewhere. Pick a path below, or read the orientation first.
Browse featured entries
The Encyclopedia
- Elohim The plural beings of Genesis — read here as a small advanced human civilization from elsewhere.
- Raëlism The 1973 message and the movement built around it — the project's primary interpretive lens.
- Precession The 26,000-year wobble of Earth's axis — the cosmic clock that times the Great Year.
- Wheel of Heaven The term, the project, and the forthcoming book of the same name.
Source Material
- The Book Which Tells the Truth The 1973 message — the founding Raëlian text and the corpus's primary lens.
- Extraterrestrials Took Me to Their Planet The 1975 sequel — the trip to the Elohim's home planet and what was shown there.
- Genesis The opening book of the Hebrew Bible — creation, flood, patriarchs.
- Enuma Elish The Babylonian creation epic — Mesopotamian cosmogony in conversation with Genesis.
What Wheel of Heaven Is
Wheel of Heaven is a long reading of an old story — the story that ancient texts from many traditions tell about where humanity came from, who made it, and why. The reading takes the Raëlian source material as its primary interpretive lens: that the Elohim of Genesis were not a deity but a team — a small advanced human civilization, capable of designing life and operating across interstellar distances. Around that lens, the project assembles biblical, Mesopotamian, Vedic, Mesoamerican, and other material, and organizes it on the only clock long enough to hold it — the precession of the equinoxes, the slow 26,000-year wobble of Earth's axis that turns the night sky into a calendar of ages.
This is a working hypothesis, not a creed. The site is built so you can check the work.
How to Read This
The site reads the comparative material through the Raëlian frame, not as a neutral arbitrator. Within that frame, claims about the canon are stated directly. Comparative claims across traditions stay hedged — Mormonism, Bahá'í, Caodaism, and the rest are read in dialogue, not flattened into "the same story." Scientific and historical claims stay measured. Critical material is presented in its own voice.
Every page carries a small badge labeling its main claim as direct, inferred, or speculative — honesty about what kind of statement you are reading.
The goal is clarity, not certainty. If the evidence shifts, the reading shifts.